Which of the following is NOT a principle of clearing title?

The principle of clearing title involves ensuring that a property is free from encumbrances, conflicts, or claims that could affect ownership. Each of the options provided plays a role in this process, except for implied consent, which does not fit within these principles.

Releases, assignments, and subordinations are all relevant actions taken to clear title. A release involves a party relinquishing their interest or claim on the property, therefore clearing the title of that specific encumbrance. An assignment pertains to the transfer of rights or interests in the property from one party to another, which can also help in clearing up any conflicting claims or liens. Subordination involves changing the priority of claims against the property, ensuring that more senior claims do not adversely affect the new interest in the property.

Implied consent, however, does not constitute a method for clearing title. While it may refer to an informal acknowledgment of rights or acceptance of certain conditions, it lacks the formal impact and legal mechanisms that the other processes possess. For effective title clearing, explicit actions like releases, assignments, and subordinations are necessary to ensure all claims are properly documented and managed. Therefore, implied consent does not align with the established principles of clearing title.