Which terms can be used interchangeably according to property law?

In property law, the terms "covenants" and "restrictions" are closely related and often used interchangeably due to their similar functions in governing the use of property. A covenant typically refers to a promise or agreement in a deed or lease that stipulates certain actions that must or must not be performed regarding the property. Meanwhile, restrictions usually refer to limitations placed on the use of property, which can stem from a covenant.

Both covenants and restrictions can affect how property can be developed, maintained, or otherwise utilized. For instance, a property may have a covenant that prohibits the construction of fences exceeding a certain height, which is effectively a restriction on the property owner’s rights. This interplay allows the terms to be used interchangeably when discussing property rights or obligations since both share the characteristic of influencing property use through agreed-upon stipulations.

In contrast, the other combinations present distinctions. Conditions typically imply more severe consequences for non-compliance (such as the potential loss of title), while legal title is a distinct concept altogether, concerning ownership rather than obligations relating to property use.